In this 4th session of TWC, this time... I found the ideas are everywhere. Though I am a little blur at first, I was finally able to catch all the ideas at the end. I couldn't help but writing down all the things that Prof said and what my peers said in discussion.
Firstly, I want to thank Prof (again) for sharing with the class a great illustration about eagle and ostrich. When problems come or when opportunities appear, we have to decide : be an eagle or an ostrich. Look closely, observe, and immediately take action fast like an eagle, or just look around, hide its head, and pretend nothing happen like an ostrich. I definitely agree that we have to be proactive and reactive in dealing with the changes that occur from time to time. Be it is a revolutionary or an evolutionary change, we have to plan ahead, be ready to face it, and execute our plan at the right place and the right time.
By the way, I found that the concept of revolutionary and evolutionary changes, as well as 'wild cards' rather interesting. I just realized that there were so many shocking events that totally have changed the way people behave and appreciate things. Take Japan as an example. After the unexpected earthquake stroke Fukushima months ago, Japan is forced to look for of a new source of energy that is safer and more sustainable. Not surprisingly, Japanese (and the rest of people in the world) are also changing their way of thinking : they are now more skeptical about the safety and the benefits of the usage of nuclear power. Hopefully, Japan or any other country can come up with a brilliant and fresh ideas that can solve this whole energy problem. Will we be able to find an alternative energy? In my opinion, in this case, the problem is not whether we can or we can't, but whether we have enough time or not. Given the current technology we possess and the advanced way of thinking we now adopt, I believe sooner or later we will come up with a brilliant idea that hopefully can solve this problem.
One presentation that I thought was captivating is the one discussing about the drawbacks of social media. How social media has corrupted us in the sense that it also gives us some negative impacts? According to my peer who is presenting, the two drawbacks are : losing identity and shortening of attention span, which I don't really agree. Let us see the bigger picture here. Social media, as well as internet, is technology that is just and good; it is a media to express our opinions, ideas, or point of views. The main problem lies within ourselves : we sometimes, undeniably, can't control our own behaviors that we end up playing games, checking our emails unnecessarily, blogging, etc. instead of using the social media wisely. Regarding the 'losing identity' statement, I have to admit that there are people who are really into the virtual world to the point they wish that the reality world doesn't exist. However, given the wide range of people who can access social media, we, the users of social media, are indirectly enriched by the so many cultures that are shared through social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, or WordPress. So, in my opinion, I'd rather suggest the term 'enriching our culture' rather than 'losing identity'.
Further Possible Discussion
Talking about social media, we have seen many breakthrough that dramatically changed the market of social media. From the first invention of Friendster to the Facebook amazing breakthrough, we have to admit there are so many things are changing. What do you think of the change management of Friendster's focus from social media to social gaming in response to Facebook amazing features that enable Facebook to thrive in the social media world?